中華心理衛生協會

歡迎光臨 中華心理衛生協會

首頁 English 網站導覽

The Feasibility of Home-based Multidisciplinary Intervention for Mediating the Impact of The Meiling Overturned Coach Accident on a Child Survivor

英文主題:
居家多領域治療在緩解梅嶺車禍意外造成之衝擊―運用於一兒童生還者可行性探討
作者:
陳怡群(Yi-Chuen Chen);黃惠玲(Huei-Lin Huang);林昭宏(Jau-Hong Lin)
關鍵詞 Key words : 居家;多領域治療;梅嶺車禍意外事件;home-based;multidisciplinary intervention;Meiling overturned coach accident
資料語文:英文
DOI: 10.30074/FJMH
卷期:
22卷4期
出刊年月:
2009年12月
起訖頁:
P.451-476
中文摘要:
研究目的:2006年12月3日,在臺灣台南梅嶺山區發生了一場遊覽車翻覆的意外事件,造成17個家庭中22人死亡及23人受傷。在這場意外中,一位十歲女性兒童生還者,失去她的雙親,而她身上則有多處骨折。本研究主要在探討以一居家多領域治療方案,來緩解梅嶺車禍意外事件,對此孩童生還者所造成身心衝擊之可行性。研究方法:經歷過緊急救護、骨科手術及十八天的住院復健醫療後,此孩童出院並接受八個月居家多領域治療,這種模式的治療計畫是由本文作者及其他身心健康專業人員所組成之危機處理團隊所發展、提供及協調。此居家多領域治療方案是在個案接受短期住院後,透過結構式的居家服務,來持續提供個案在個案管理、物理治療方案和預防性心理介入三大領域上之服務。研究結果:療效成果顯示居家多領域治療可能有助於改善此孩童之身體功能及緩解此意外事件造成之心理衝擊。研究結論:本文最後,針對於居家多領域治療之優點(例如:減少在就醫過程中交通運輸問題、節省住院治療所需的龐大醫療費用……等)及缺點(例如:居家服務時間安排不易、可提供服務之對象有限……等)做探討,以做為讀者日後欲運用此治療模式於隨機化受控研究,或處理其他類型創傷意外事件個案上的參考。
英文摘要:
Purpose: A coach accident occurred in Meiling, Tainan, Taiwan on December 3, 2006. It involved approximately 17 families, and caused 22 deaths and 23 injuries. As a result of the accident, a 10-year-old girl lost both her parents and sustained multiple fractures. The present paper centers on presenting our experience with and evaluating the feasibility of home-based multidisciplinary intervention (HBMI) for mediating the impact of an accident on a child survivor. Methods: After undergoing emergency care, surgery, and 18-day inpatient rehabilitation, the child was discharged and received the 8-month HBMI, which was developed, provided, and coordinated by the crisis intervention response team comprised of the authors of this paper and other health/mental health professionals. The HBMI comprised structured home services after a short-term hospitalization. During home services, the child underwent case management services, a physical therapy program, and a preventative psychological intervention. Results: HBMI improved the child's muscle strength, facilitated daily living activities, and supported management of psychological consequences resulting from the accident. Conclusions: The advantages (e.g., reduction in transfer challenges, saving massive inpatient medical expenses) and limitations (e.g., difficulties in scheduling visits, limited service delivery) of the HBMI are discussed to guide its future application to randomized controlled studies or among those who have experienced other types of traumatic accidents.
電子文章下載處:
http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/Index/10237283-200912-200912290077-200912290077-451-476
備註:

TOP

會址:103台北市大同區民權西路136號16樓之1
電話:02-25576980 | 傳真:02-25576871
電子郵件:mhat.tw2@gmail.com