中文版多向度完美主義量表之心理計量分析
英文主題:
Psychometric Analyses of the Chinese Version of the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (CMPS): Reliability and Validity
作者:
陳正嘉(Cheng-Chia Chen);柯慧貞(Huei-Chen Ko);林旻沛(Min-Pei Lin);周鉦翔(Cheng-Hsiang Chou);陳廣圻(Kuang-Chi Chen)
關鍵詞 Key words : 多向度完美主義量表;信度;效度;multidimensional perfectionism;reliability;validity
資料語文:繁體中文
DOI:
10.30074/FJMH
卷期:
24卷1期
出刊年月:
2011年3月
起訖頁:
P.61-96
中文摘要:
研究目的:本研究旨在修訂中文版多向度完美主義量表,並進行信效度分析;也驗證Frost的六向度完美主義建構與二因素次層結構。根據文獻分析,本研究假設「過度在乎錯誤」、「對行動的懷疑」、「父母批評」及「父母期望」分量表分數,與強迫症狀或憂鬱症狀量尺分數呈低度相關;「個人標準」分量表分數與憂鬱症狀分數及強迫症狀量尺分數呈正相關;而「組織性」分量表分數與憂鬱症狀或強迫症狀分數則無關;並據此進行量表之效標效度分析。研究方法:透過分層叢集取樣,由南區大專校院大學生抽樣有效樣本2,190名;自填中文版多向度完美主義量表、身心健康評估量表。研究結果:全量表內部一致性為.938,分量表內部一致性介於.736~.903,六向度建構及二次層因素建構適配度指標良好,量表與各效標間關係亦支持上述假設。研究結論:中文版多向度完美主義量表具良好之信度、效標關聯效度,並支持Frost的六向度完美主義建構與二因素次層結構模型。
英文摘要:
Purpose: The goals of this study were to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (CMPS), to examine the six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two second-order factors as proposed by Frost, and to explore the relationships among the six dimensions, two second-order factors, depressive symptoms, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Based on a literature review, the following hypotheses were examined: the subscale scores on ”Concern over Mistakes”, ”Doubting of Action”, ”Parental Expectation”, and ”Parental Criticism” had positive relationships with both the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptom scores; the ”Personal Standard” subscale score had a weak relationship with the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptoms scores; the ”Organization” subscale score was not correlated with either depressive or obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. Methods: Using stratified and cluster sampling, a total of 2,190 college students (mean age=19.718) were recruited from southern Taiwan and administered the CMPS, Ko Depression Inventory, and Symptoms Check List-90-R. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was .938 for the CMPS and ranged within between .736 and .903 for the subscales. Moreover, the six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two-second order factors had good model-fit evaluations. In addition, the ”Concern over Mistakes”, ”Doubting of Action”, ”Parental Expectation”, and ”Parental Criticism” subscales had positive relationships with the depressive symptom and obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. The ”Personal Standard” subscale score had weak relationships with the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptoms scores. The ”Organization” subscale score was not correlated with either depressive or obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. Results supported all hypotheses. We also found that males had higher scores than females on ”Parental Expectation” and ”Doubting of Action”. Conclusions: The CMPS is a reliable and valid measurement of perfectionism. Moreover, Frost's six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two second-order structures was supported.
電子文章下載處:
http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/Index?DocID=10237283-201103-201107060002-201107060002-61-96