中華心理衛生協會

歡迎光臨 中華心理衛生協會

首頁 English 網站導覽

雙工作家庭的生活滿意:工作-家庭衝突與互利的影響

英文主題:
Life Satisfaction of Dual-income Families: The Effect of Work-family Conflict and Facilitation
作者:
周麗端(Li-Tuan Chou)
關鍵詞 Key words : 工作-家庭衝突;工作-家庭互利;雙工作家庭;Work-family conflict;Work-family facilitation;Dual-income families
資料語文:繁體中文
DOI: 10.30074/FJMH
卷期:
25卷3期
出刊年月:
2012年9月
起訖頁:
P.377-418
中文摘要:
研究目的:過去探討工作-家庭互動的研究,受到角色耗竭觀點的影響,多半採工作-家庭衝突觀點,並將工作-家庭衝突區分為工作對家庭的衝突(WFC)、家庭對工作的衝突(FWC)。近年來,受到正向心理學的影響,工作與家庭互動的研究,將工作-家庭互利的觀點加入原有的工作-家庭衝突架構中,從研究發現提出工作的投入也能讓家庭受惠,而家庭的投入也能讓工作受惠,因此,工作-家庭互利包括工作對家庭之利(WFF)及家庭對工作之利(FWF)雙向因素。本研究主要目的有二,一為瞭解雙工作家庭中,是否同時存在「工作-家庭衝突」、「工作-家庭互利」,其強度為何;二為控制性別、年齡、教育、職業後,分析雙工作家庭的「工作-家庭衝突」、「工作-家庭互利」分別對生活滿意的解釋力為何。研究方法:本研究採問卷調查,以家有18歲以下子女的家長且為雙工作家庭為對象,以分層比率叢集抽樣法,從臺灣各縣市(金門、連江除外)之高中職、國中、國小抽取樣本。採3%抽樣誤差,95%信賴水準,回收有效樣本共769人。研究結果:以主成分、斜交轉軸因素分析工作-家庭衝突量表,抽出工作對家庭的衝突(WFC)、家庭對工作的衝突(FWC)二獨立因素;而工作-家庭互利則只抽出一個因素,即工作-家庭互利(W-FF)因素。雙工作家庭的W-FF顯著高於WFC、FWC,打破過去只以角色耗竭觀探討工作與家庭互動的迷思。階層迴歸分析發現,在控制性別、年齡、教育程度、職業後,工作-家庭衝突、工作-家庭互利分別可以獨立解釋家庭生活滿意,其解釋變異量依序為7.0%、6.0%。研究結論:國人的「工作-家庭衝突」發生頻率並不強,接近「有時衝突」;而「工作-家庭互利」發生頻率較強,接近「經常互利」。在工作-家庭間的互動中,「工作-家庭衝突」與「工作-家庭互利」並存,而這二者間雖顯著相關,但卻能各自獨立解釋生活滿意,因此在研究工作與家庭互動時,必須同時被考量。
英文摘要:
Purpose: The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate the extent of work-family conflict and facilitation in dual-income families and whether they are independent, and (2) to investigate whether the life satisfaction of dual-income families is explained by work-family conflict and facilitation separately by controlling gender, age, educational level, and occupation. Methods: A questionnaire and proportional sampling were used to obtain responses from 798 dual-career families with under 18 years old child from 22 cities and counties in Taiwan. Results: The results indicated that the work-family interface likely represents multiple dimensions composed of bidirectional (work-to-family and family-to-work) conflict and unidirectional facilitation. Participants experienced significantly higher levels of work-family facilitation than work-family conflict. After controlling for gender, age, educational level, and occupation, hierarchical regression analysis showed that the work-family interface significantly explained the level of life satisfaction of dual-income families. Work-family conflict and family-work facilitation explained only 7.0% and 6.0% of the total variance, respectively. Conclusions: The findings indicated that work-family conflict and facilitation related significantly, however, life satisfaction of dual-income families was influenced by work-family conflict and facilitation concurrently. This is a milestone as revealed ways of enhancing life satisfaction by emphasizing work-family positive spillover. Since a popular research focus has been work-family conflict, a concept underpinned by the scarcity hypothesis, researchers have to test the idea that work and family can facilitate one another, rather than just conflict in the future studies.
電子文章下載處:
http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/Index?DocID=10237283-201209-201212130014-201212130014-377-418
備註:

TOP

會址:103台北市大同區民權西路136號16樓之1
電話:02-25576980 | 傳真:02-25576871
電子郵件:mhat.tw2@gmail.com